Discover what project delivery is, how it works, and its challenges. Learn about the different methods in project delivery and find the best one for your project.
Published 19 Jul 2022
Project delivery refers to the comprehensive process of carrying out and completing projects such as the construction or renovation of a facility or building, among others. It requires careful planning, design, and construction measures from different actors. The project delivery system requires multiple roles, standards, and a defined set of procedures to proceed.
The project delivery system involves the following key actors:
Whether it involves a small-scale facility or a large-scale residential subdivision, every project goes through four phases. Here’s a walkthrough of the stages in delivering a construction project.
Phases of Project Delivery
Every successful project starts with a solid plan. This project delivery phase involves developing and organizing a strategy for carrying out the project. In this phase, the owner also decides on how the project will proceed from beginning to end.
A comprehensive project plan includes the following elements:
Once the plan is complete, the process moves to the design phase. The design team develops the blueprint and foundations according to the objectives and requirements of the project. They also present their business case, which includes the following aspects:
After the design phase, the project is on its way towards completion. In other words, the implementation phase is where the bulk of the work occurs.
Construction and monitoring often take place at this phase. The contractors work on the job site and realize the design provided in the previous phase. The pace of implementation will depend on different factors, such as the project goals, timetable, and any changes that the owner requires.
Project delivery doesn’t end when the facility is built or when remodeling or renovation work is finished. This is where the close-out phase comes in, as the culmination of the entire process. This phase wraps up all the tasks and activities related to project delivery, such as the following:
Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Method
The design-bid-build model is the most popular method of project delivery. In this method, the owner hires a designer and a contractor separately. It follows a traditional sequence, and the roles don’t overlap. Here’s an overview of the process:
Pros: This method provides owners with more control over the project. It’s also simpler to manage because it’s a method familiar to most designers and contractors. Moreover, the competitive bidding process lets owners secure the lowest price and save money.
Cons: It takes a lot of time because one phase needs to be complete before proceeding to the next one. For example, construction only starts when the design is finalized. Moreover, there’s little collaboration between the designer and the contractor.
Best for: This method works best for less complex, budget-sensitive projects.
Design-Build (DB) Method
The design-build has become a popular alternative to the traditional DBB process. Instead of having a separate designer and contractor, this method combines both functions in one called the design-builder. It reduces the lengthy time frame from the traditional method, making it great for fast-tracking projects.
Pros: The process becomes more efficient since only one team handles the design and construction phases. The turnaround time becomes shorter too, resulting in less cost and minimal risk.
Cons: There’s less control from the owner, as contractors make the most decisions in designing and building the project. The challenge for owners, in this case, is selecting the right firm to do the job.
Best for: This method is ideal for time-sensitive projects that require an accelerated timeline.
Construction Manager-at-Risk (CMR) Method
This method resembles the DBB model but with a stark difference. In the CMR model, the owner hires a Construction Manager (CM) to oversee the entire project and help meet their goals. This method is ideal for those who want the help of a professional with specific expertise in completing projects.
In this method, the owner provides the initial design and leaves the management details to the CM. For the rest of the process, the CM is responsible for:
Pros: By setting a maximum fixed price, this method helps lower construction costs. Moreover, owners can utilize the expertise of a construction manager in selecting the most efficient means and delivering projects with fewer costs and better quality.
Cons: If the costs go beyond the set threshold, the construction manager must shoulder them, leading to lower profits on their side. Moreover, any disagreement between the CM and the owner can delay schedules.
Best for: This method works best for projects with limited management resources.
Multi-Prime (MP) Method
This method stands out from the rest, for the owner functions as the general contractor. They contract directly with the firms for the design and construction phases. For example, owners will reach out to an architecture firm for designing the project and to specialty contractors for specific needs.
Pros: Experienced project owners can exercise greater control over the budget. They handle the budget, timeline, and other aspects of the entire project. They can also cut costs by procuring materials directly from suppliers.
Cons: The owner becomes solely responsible for coordinating multiple contractors at once. Poor coordination can then cause delays in schedule and cost valuable resources.
Best for: This method is best for speeding up operations in times of emergency.
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Method
The integrated project delivery method places collaboration and teamwork at the heart of its operations. This emerging method integrates the functions of designers, contractors, and other team members in optimizing project delivery.
Instead of working separately, the team joins forces even in the early stages of the process. Each of them plays a role in the entire process, from design to construction. Everything is shared across all teams—from information and responsibilities to liabilities and accomplishments.
Pros: This method streamlines the delivery process by coordinating all teams throughout the process. It also improves efficiency when combined with the Lean method and other tools. Moreover, it maximizes the expertise of the team members in planning and management.
Cons: The owner needs to engage with everyone involved in the project. It also requires rigorous metrics for design, engineering, costs, and other factors. Since it’s a relatively new method, not all stakeholders are familiar with this.
Best for: This method works best for complex projects that require coordination among different stakeholders.
Selecting a project delivery method is crucial for the success of any project. After all, it will set the tone for how the process will go for the entire team.
Thus, project owners need to carefully consider the following aspects when choosing the method that will work best for their project:
Delivering projects is anything but easy. Project owners can rise to the challenge by anticipating any issues and proactively thinking of solutions. Here are the most common challenges in project delivery and ways to resolve them:
Use iAuditor to improve your project delivery system. It combines the tools you need to complete your projects safely on one platform. Meet your project delivery goals and objectives with the following iAuditor features:
Use this project management template to standardize the process. Define the project scope, identify deliverables and objectives, and create a list of tasks for your team members. Draft plans to allocate resources, organize finances, and assess quality performance. Kickstart the project delivery process with this template.
Project managers can use this template to track the status of their projects. Complete reports in one click, keep a record of progress, and keep stakeholders informed. Measure project status against the schedule and follow important milestones with this template.
Leizel Estrellas is a content writer and researcher for SafetyCulture. Her academic and professional training as a researcher allows her to write meaningful articles that create a lasting impact. As a content specialist, she strives to promote a culture of safety in the workplace through accessible and reader-friendly content. With her high-quality work, she is keen on helping businesses across industries identify issues and opportunities to improve every day.
10 Examples of Process Improvement Projects Here are ten examples of process improvement projects ...
The first step in conducting a bottleneck analysis is to identify the main steps in the production ...
It’s a simple but powerful technique that can help you get to the bottom of things in a ...
Something went wrong with your submission.
Trying to log in? Click here to log in
Contact us if you require any assistance with this form.