Learn what it is, why you should conduct one, and how to get started.
Published 28 Mar 2023
A Road Safety Audit (RSA) measures the safety performance of an existing or future road or intersection to reduce potential accidents. RSA can be conducted at various road or highway project stages, such as during the planning, design, or construction phases.
Road analysis takes into account their operational characteristics and design elements. A team of experts usually conducts the audit process, which assesses risk factors and recommends improvements. The assessment consists of an examination from the perspective of pedestrians and vehicular users, including cyclists.
There are many benefits associated with carrying out a road safety audit. These include:
The process of carrying out a road safety audit follows several steps:
A project manager should evaluate the impact of each road project on the road network to maintain a trackable record of the selection criteria for road projects that need to be audited. When an RSA is determined to be necessary for a project, the client organization’s project manager should specify the following conditions in their safety audit brief:
Project managers and safety engineers should collaborate to select a road safety audit team appropriate for the road project being audited. Road safety auditors should be people outside the design organization to ensure impartiality and objectivity.
The project manager should create an audit brief for the road safety auditors with appropriate project information, such as the parameters identified during Step 1. The brief should include recommendations regarding what should be included in the audit and provide an opportunity to ask for additional information.
Before visiting the site, the road safety auditors must review design drawings and other provided information for all stages of the RSA. This review is essential to understand how road users could interpret the planned project and possible safety issues.
Additional data must accompany the designs to help measure the project’s safety against current practices. Comments should only concern road user and operator safety.
The road safety auditors must conduct a risk assessment before visiting the site. All team members must use the necessary Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) during the site inspection.
The team should verify the issues identified in Step 4 during the site visit and record any additional issues. Photographic or video evidence should be used when writing the audit report and debriefing.
Peak-hour visits and observations off-peak may be required during the audit to understand how traffic interacts with the layout during these times. A visit during nighttime is also necessary to identify any visibility issues.
Using the information from Step 4 and the site visit, the audit team should conclude their findings and identify ways to improve safety. They should discuss these results with the Project Manager, Design Team, and Safety Engineer. They can present their data at this meeting, including photos and video. Safety Engineers can ask questions and request more information about the audit’s findings, while the Design Team can share their actions and recommendations.
Document the minutes of the Road Safety Audit debrief meeting to prevent subjective decisions from being included in the report and to reduce the risk of misinterpretation by the Project Manager.
The audit team leader is responsible for the content of the audit report. Reports should be concise with clear numbered issues and written with the support of the audit team. It may be necessary to include photos or illustrations to support each case. In addition, standards, guidance, and reports should be listed where appropriate. The report must adhere to the timeframe defined in the RSAudit brief.
The audit report should be sent to the Project Manager, accompanied by a letter listing any road safety issues not covered in Step 1 of the project.
After the audit report is submitted to the client, they will ask the design team to evaluate each issue and recommendation in a Decision Tracking Form. After consulting with the design team, the project manager has approved or denied the safety issue. The Decision Tracking Form should consider factors such as:
Those items outside the project scope described in Step 1 should be referred to the appropriate authority or organization by the Project Manager.
To reduce safety risks, the project manager or the design team should outline what actions need to be taken. The Decision Tracking Form should outline the reasons for rejecting a safety issue.
Submit the Decision Tracking Form to the RSA team for record-keeping upon completion. The Project Manager’s proposed actions outlined in the report should also be implemented according to the specifications of the Decision Tracking Form and established timeline.
If any issues outlined in the Decision Tracking Form warrant further consideration, the client should prepare an exception report for review by the design team and stakeholders.
The design team and stakeholders will meet to agree to the changes to the draft exceptions report before releasing the final exceptions report to the audit team and the client.
The exception reports, decision tracking forms, and RSA Reports are stored as evidence of the road safety audit process.
It is common practice in the United Kingdom and Australia to conduct road safety audits, which are now becoming more widespread in the United States. In the UK, these are mandatory for all trunk roads (including motorways). Section GG, 119 of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (formerly HD19/15) provides requirements for a Road Safety Audit.
Potential safety issues identified during a Road Safety Audit include:
The audit may also identify pedestrian or bicycle safety issues, such as inadequate crosswalks or bike lanes.
Road safety is a critical issue that affects people all over the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) identifies the following issues affecting road safety:
Road safety issues can be complex and challenging to solve. It is not just a question of improving infrastructure or enforcement but also of changing attitudes and behavior. Fatalities are often the result of human error, so designing interventions that target behaviors can be challenging. In addition, there may be financial, cultural, or political barriers to implementing safety measures in certain regions.
SafetyCulture (formerly iAuditor) is a cloud-based multi-purpose inspection platform that provides various tools to help you plan and manage your audits, including project management, audit checklists, data collection, analytics, and reporting. Audit teams can benefit from SafetyCulture by:
Rob Paredes is a content contributor for SafetyCulture. He is a content writer who also does copy for websites, sales pages, and landing pages. Rob worked as a financial advisor, a freelance copywriter, and a Network Engineer for more than a decade before joining SafetyCulture. He got interested in writing because of the influence of his friends; aside from writing, he has an interest in personal finance, dogs, and collecting Allen Iverson cards.
What is the Importance of Eye Protection Equipment? Our eyes are delicate organs that require proper...
The Importance of PPE in Electrical Safety As per the Safety and Health Magazine, the Electrical ...
Importance Safety communication is such an important aspect of the modern workplace because it deals...